Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Raelus amends p40

[Raelus <raelusaetherira@xxxxxxxxx>]

Peter Cooper Jr. wrote:

> eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>  
>
> > Aren't you normally supposed to have a name in == rulename == or
> > something like that to show the rule has a name?
> >    
>
> That seems to be the convention (it used to be surrounded by _, but
> the current rules database (the wiki) uses equal signs for headers, so
> I've been using that).
>
> However, the rules don't recognize the need for rules (nor proposals
> for that matter) to have names or titles at all. Nor do they define
> what that would mean. Which is kind of interesting, seeing as there
> are rules referencing the titles of things.
>
>  
Interesting. I hadn't really thought of this...hehe...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss