Alex Truelsen on Tue, 3 May 2005 16:28:42 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] You have been busy little penquins havn't you.


> 30. The person who wrote this is an idioit.


No, he's not... just because e can't spell "idiot" doesn't mean e's any less 
of a good person. Well, the Grammar Nazi might argue otherwise, but that's 
beside the point.


> 34. Could couldn't I pwn and then claim sould untill they are all missing 
> somewhere and have say 10000 sp? Why would you want to pay sp to get a pwned 
> soul? I doubt people have much incentive to risk pwning their own and the 
> other souls are all the same.


First question: No, because it costs 100 SP to claim a Lost Soul right now. 
If you took your time, you could turn over all of the Souls out there and 
make a few SP per Soul, but odds are everyone would be doing that, so it 
wouldn't get you far. Second question: All Souls cost SP. So you have to pay 
SP to buy a Pwned Soul. And the incentive is that once you do, you can 
afford to do other things - the idea is that Mystical activities cost SP, 
not Souls, so Souls are worthless until sold. What's needed is a way to make 
SP without playing the Soul market, or rather a lot of ways to do that.

35. As long as there are reasonable ways to get chips awesome points can 
> take over literary proposals.


*shrug* We'll see what the proposal says when the nweek ends - maybe I'll 
remember to edit it, maybe I won't. 

41. I'm going to regret voting yes for this one.


We all will. But it will be good for us, because a typo in the rules would 
be worse.

[[BvS]]
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss