Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] RainbowWolfe submits p7

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

T'is true. I'm proposing that it's added to the rules so that this is
done. That way different people can clear up old rules much easier.

For example: The tidy proposed to the previous ruleset.

- RW

On 4/18/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > I suppose I could propose that we could always create Rule 0 and list
> > any other rules that were amended for that section. That way if that
> > section was to be deleted it would make keeping the rules tidy much
> > easier (which is my actual purpose) - it would give players a
> > reference on what rules may need changing / deleting.
> 
> Well, it seems like if we want to add cross-references, we could just
> do that through comments without needing to worry about trying to get
> the rules to figure out which sections are interconnected.
> 
> --
> Peter C.
> "There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
> returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact."
>                -- Mark Twain
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss