Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] PlayerPersonman votes

[Jake Eakle <jseakle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No harm, I suppose, though I think Executive tidiness-ing it would be fine,
since it's pretty obvious we don't want to be giving points for comments.
Shelve away. 

--Personman 

On 3/3/05 3:43 AM, "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (recording Personman's votes) writes:
>> Proposal 2021/0: Fixing Cinquains                         : Yes
>> Executive tidiness can add 'non-comment' before 'lines'. Then all
>> will be well. 
> 
> Well, someone could write a huge all-comment prop in Cinquain form,
> and then object to the Executive tidiness change. Also, I think that
> it's a functional enough change to the prop that Executive Tidiness
> shouldn't be changing it in that way. Since it's not likely to affect
> anything this next nweek anyway, what's the harm in Shelving it until
> then and fixing it then?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss