Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Zarpint submits p1953

[Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:41:57PM -0500, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> 
> On Dec 3, 2004, at 2.38 PM, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Zarpint has submitted a new proposal, p1953.
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Proposal 1953/0: What's a Win without the Glory?
> > A Standard Proposal by Zarpint
> > Last modified on nweek 74, nday 1
> >
> > Change r27 to:
> > {{
> > If a player's score ever exceeds 1000 points, e receives 1
> > Permanent Glory, all points are destroyed, and this rule becomes
> > Deactivated. That Player is said to have won.
> >
> > Awarding a Player a Win means to increase eir Permanent Glory by
> > 1. This does not destroy all points or deactivate this Rule.
> > Awarding a Win is an Action that may only be performed as
> > explicitly specified in the Ruleset.
> > }}
> >
> > Award Rodney a Win.
> 
> E already got a Win, and I don't think I'd vote to give em another... 
> But if you'd like to give em a point of Glory, that's fine.

That's what this prop does.

> 
> I don't think Awarding a Win should be an Action; a player is awarded a 
> win when the rules say so, but no entity actually Awards Wins to other 
> players. This phrasing implies that I might be able to Award wins to 
> other players should I so desire.

You might, if it's explicitly specified in the Ruleset. It's not
right now.

> 
> Also, putting all of this in the same rule means that if I get 1000 
> points, suddenly 'Awarding a Player a Win' no longer means increasing 
> eir Permanent Glory by 1, as the defining rule is deactivated.

Fix forthcoming.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss