Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Looptek (Win)

[Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:55:58PM -0500, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> 
> On Nov 11, 2004, at 1.23 PM, Jeremy Cook wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:35:32AM -0800, Dan Schmidt wrote:
> >> Yes it's true; I have Yet Another Loophole.
> >>
> >> Behold! Rule 216/1
> >> {{
> >> To "propose a rule" is defined to mean making a
> >> proposal which contains one Action, which is to create
> >> a Rule.[snip]
> >> }}
> >> Thus making a rule is an Action.
> >>
> >> I do the aforemetioned Action. and make a rule with
> >> the name Looptek
> >> {{
> >> Rodney may, as a Game Action,Gain 1 point.
> >> Rodney may also, as a Game Action, modify or delete a
> >> rule.
> >> }}
> >
> > That's not a legal Action, as it changes the gamestate and no rule 
> > gives
> > you the power to create rules.
> 
> Actually, it looks one does. Rule 216 says that creating a rule is an 
> Action, and r1896 says that any player can perform any Game Action at 
> any time.

No: "Any Outsider may take any Game Action at any time unless the rules
say otherwise." r393 says otherwise. Since no other rule says it's
legal, it isn't.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss