|Daniel Lepage on Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:35:55 -0500 (CDT)|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [spoon-discuss] SB reply-to|
On Aug 1, 2004, at 5.24 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 1 Aug 2004 at 17:20, Daniel Lepage wrote:On Aug 1, 2004, at 4.56 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:I'd get off my butt and vote for it being s-b and s-d in the header...How would you rank these choices? 1) Keep the long tags 2) Use the short tags 3) Put in new headers 4) Don't add anything I have rankings already from me, Phil, bd, SkArcher, Teucer, and sort of from Sagitta (e said "2 or 4. I like approval voting.") In the future, I hope this is the sort of thing the Minister of Communications would be in charge of.Given those four, I'd say: 2 - s-b and s-d 4 - certainly don't make it any longer3 - This would depend on what "put in" means. If it means making it longer, I'd prefer 1 overit. Otherwise, if it's still clear yet shorter, this works for me.
By 'new headers' I mean new mail headers, so there'd be a Bnomic-From:discussion or something added to the headers (and nothing added to the subject).
-- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss