Re: [spoon-discuss] SB reply-to

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Aug 1, 2004, at 5.24 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On 1 Aug 2004 at 17:20, Daniel Lepage wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 2004, at 4.56 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > I'd get off my butt and vote for it being s-b and s-d in the 
> > > header...
> >
> > How would you rank these choices?
> > 	1) Keep the long tags
> > 	2) Use the short tags
> > 	3) Put in new headers
> > 	4) Don't add anything
> >
> > I have rankings already from me, Phil, bd, SkArcher, Teucer, and sort
> > of from Sagitta (e said "2 or 4. I like approval voting.")
> >
> > In the future, I hope this is the sort of thing the Minister of
> > Communications would be in charge of.
>
> Given those four, I'd say:
>
> 2 - s-b and s-d
> 4 - certainly don't make it any longer
> 3 - This would depend on what "put in" means.  If it means making it 
> longer, I'd prefer 1 over
> it.  Otherwise, if it's still clear yet shorter, this works for me.

By 'new headers' I mean new mail headers, so there'd be a 
Bnomic-From:discussion or something added to the headers (and nothing 
added to the subject).

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss