Daniel Lepage on Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:35:55 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] SB reply-to

On Aug 1, 2004, at 5.24 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 1 Aug 2004 at 17:20, Daniel Lepage wrote:

On Aug 1, 2004, at 4.56 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I'd get off my butt and vote for it being s-b and s-d in the header...

How would you rank these choices?
	1) Keep the long tags
	2) Use the short tags
	3) Put in new headers
	4) Don't add anything

I have rankings already from me, Phil, bd, SkArcher, Teucer, and sort
of from Sagitta (e said "2 or 4. I like approval voting.")

In the future, I hope this is the sort of thing the Minister of
Communications would be in charge of.

Given those four, I'd say:

2 - s-b and s-d
4 - certainly don't make it any longer
3 - This would depend on what "put in" means. If it means making it longer, I'd prefer 1 over
it.  Otherwise, if it's still clear yet shorter, this works for me.

By 'new headers' I mean new mail headers, so there'd be a Bnomic-From:discussion or something added to the headers (and nothing added to the subject).


spoon-discuss mailing list