glotmorf on Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:24:40 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] SB reply-to |
On 1 Aug 2004 at 17:20, Daniel Lepage wrote: > On Aug 1, 2004, at 4.56 PM, glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > I'd get off my butt and vote for it being s-b and s-d in the header... > > How would you rank these choices? > 1) Keep the long tags > 2) Use the short tags > 3) Put in new headers > 4) Don't add anything > > I have rankings already from me, Phil, bd, SkArcher, Teucer, and sort > of from Sagitta (e said "2 or 4. I like approval voting.") > > In the future, I hope this is the sort of thing the Minister of > Communications would be in charge of. Given those four, I'd say: 2 - s-b and s-d 4 - certainly don't make it any longer 3 - This would depend on what "put in" means. If it means making it longer, I'd prefer 1 over it. Otherwise, if it's still clear yet shorter, this works for me. Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss