glotmorf on Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:55:50 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] SB reply-to |
On 1 Aug 2004 at 15:51, Joel Uckelman wrote: > Thus spake Daniel Lepage: > > On Aug 1, 2004, at 4.43 PM, Phil Ulrich wrote: > > > > > Just out of curiosity, why is the spoon-business reply-to header set > > > to spoon-discuss? That's why my ministerial votes wound up on the > > > wrong forum, I just hit reply to Zarpint's list of ministers without > > > noticing where it was going. > > > > It's because most replies to -business messages are discussion about > > the business, which is why the last 14 message or so all start with > > [spoon-discuss] Re: [spoon-business] and I can't see the rest of the > > subjects. > > I'm always willing to change that, if you guys ever reach concensus on > it. :) I'd get off my butt and vote for it being s-b and s-d in the header... Glotmorf _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss