Daniel Peter Lepage on Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:41:06 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [s-d]Roster Stuff |
-----Original Message----- > Date: Fri Jul 16 11:25:47 EDT 2004 > From: "Glotmorf" <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [s-d]Roster Stuff > To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> > > On 16 Jul 2004 at 10:55, athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:31:56AM -0400, Daniel Peter Lepage wrote: > > > Zarpint wrote: > > > You don't actually delete the fund and other game > > objects, just the > > rules that declare their existence. They > > probably still have some sort > > of nebulous existence. > > I thought > > we'd had a CFI about such things, but I can't find it in the archive. > > We did discuss it at one point, though, and I believe we reached the > > conclusion that once an object ceases to be defined by the rules it > > ceases to exist for all intents and purposes. Specifically, the text > > of r13 makes it clear that to be a Game Object, a thing must be > > described by the rules, so repealing the defining rule causes a thing > > to cease to be a Game Object. > > > > Not so clear to me. The object existed at one point. At no point was > > it ever destroyed, though the Rules mentioning it were repealed. There > > have been proposals that specifically deleted objects after repealing > > the rules, suggesting that deleting the rule doesn't delete the > > object. I'm not sure that it is no longer a Game Object. > > There have been instances of "legacy" objects -- objects that > existed long enough to get into players' possession, which > meant they were part of the gamestate, and therefore, by > Dave's interpretation, didn't go away just because the rule > did. There was also an instance of something existing > according to one version of a rule, the rule changing, and it > being decided that the objects still belonged to the old rule > rather than the new rule -- Wonko's "Stock Scam". I thought I lost that suit... the "Stock Scam" was when I bought a billion shares of somebody's stock (Mithrandir, I think) for free because e had no points and then sold them back at two BNS apiece after giving em 11 points. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss