Re: [spoon-discuss] Rules

[athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:11:30AM +0100, SkArcher wrote:
> All of the currently proposed rulesets have one problem: they are B Nomic 
> Rulesets.
> 
> I would rather see something a lot more bare-bones, so that we can develop 
> new and interesting Scams. There haven't been enough good scams recently.

I understand your point. Two options that come to mind are:

- starting with the version of Suber's ruleset modified for computer
  play

  and

- starting with the one rule "Players may change the gamestate if a
  majority agrees to." I guess we'd also need a list of initial players. 

Someone could propose something simple like one of those.
The Pause is now at 3.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss