Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Whoops.

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 11, 2004, at 12.34 AM, Glotmorf wrote:

> The intent of r0 was to act independently of the entire rest
> of the ruleset, if necessary.  The previous version of r0 that
> referenced an Administrator started out by saying that, as
> part of the Procedure, "an Administrator is determined."  That
> sentence, plus the reference at the beginning of r0 that says
> a missing Administrator is a possible emergency condition,
> should indicate that the intent was to figure out at that time
> who is or should be the Administrator, which may or may not be
> Dave.
>
> So...exactly why was this changed?

The original rule seemed to assume that if we already had an admin, 
we'd have em be the Admin under r0 as well. During the last emergency, 
though, I became the emergency admin, because Dave was busy with other 
things. After the SOE ended, we realized that we weren't sure what 
happened now... was I the overall admin, having become so according to 
r0? Was Dave still the admin, since the rules state that e is? Were we 
both considered to be 'the admin'?

To clear this up, somebody proposed to replace 'administrator' with 
'emergency-coordinator' in r0; as far as I can tell, the problem with 
r0 is that they missed an occurrence of 'administrator'.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss