Re: [spoon-discuss] Presence, and C Nomic

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:15:54 -0700 (PDT), Glotmorf <nomicmorf@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

<SNIP> glotmorf's comments, to which I agree

I'm back briefly between jobs, but I'm not going on leave as I will be 
leaving again tomorrow for more work :/ sucks like that

I think it would be best if the idea Glotmorf proposes were tied closely 
to the Ruleset/Rulebooks ideas - make any rules that are part of the 
Ruleset Rulebook require automation, with any that do not have the 
required automation becoming automatically suspended? This would 
re-inforce correct Rulebooking of rules for subgames, which is itself an 
important benefit.

I seriously would slim the game down even further than current proposals - 
except for in the Player category, where I would try to nail down the 
existence of players and their in-game representations as being somewhat 
more immutable than they are currently.

Incidentally, with regard to Wonko's ctrl-w prop: I would prefer that r155 
remained in the Rules. r214 is likewise debateable. 216 is a standard 
special case rule; I suggest it be kept.

I note that r255 and r257 overlap somewhat, and their function could be 
merged.

r407 is a useful "catch-all" definition which can be applied to multiple 
subgames; I suggest keeping it

I would, to be frank, get rid of r437

I note that r573 will need a rewrite

I would prefer to finally see the back of r578 and r625 - the latter of 
which will need an extensive rewrite anyhow

I would keep Mentorship




--
 SkArcher
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss