Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 55 BALLOT (finally!)

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:32:10 -0500, Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> On Fri,  9 Jan 2004 11:02:02 -0600, Baron von Skippy <bvs@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>
> > -I will only vote for this if you can promise me that you've looked 
> > through the /whole/ ruleset and made /absolutely/ sure that this isn't 
> > going to result in any screwed-up sentences... it's amazing how badly 
> > that can foul up a game, especially when it happens about twenty times.-
>
> I did, and I didn't see anything that would break, with a couple 
> exceptions. First of all, rule 0 would break due to the r0 admin not 
> being the same (necessarily) as the real admin, but SkArcher's prop 
> would fix this if it passed. Second, r437, section A.4 (Song Form) would 
> gain an extra syllable in one line, but it should be okay.

I will be voting against this because it is utterly pointless and I never 
belive that something like this is going to work flawlessly. Besides, his 
name isn't Bob.


SkArcher
 
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss