Zarpint Jeremy Cook on 9 Jan 2004 18:42:30 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 55 BALLOT (finally!) |
Hmm... what happens if a song form becomes out of form after it's passed? Nothing I guess...but say we turned "Bob" into "Chief Defenestrator" in a limerick. It wouldn't be a limerick anymore. What then? On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Mark Karasek wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:02:02 -0600, Baron von Skippy <bvs@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > -I will only vote for this if you can promise me that you've looked > > through the /whole/ ruleset and made /absolutely/ sure that this isn't > > going to result in any screwed-up sentences... it's amazing how badly > > that can foul up a game, especially when it happens about twenty times.- > > I did, and I didn't see anything that would break, with a couple > exceptions. First of all, rule 0 would break due to the r0 admin not being > the same (necessarily) as the real admin, but SkArcher's prop would fix > this if it passed. Second, r437, section A.4 (Song Form) would gain an > extra syllable in one line, but it should be okay. > > --The Pusher Robot > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > -- Zarpint "All thy toiling only breeds new dreams, new dreams; Jeremy Cook there is no truth saving in thine own heart." mcfoufou@xxxxxxxxx --W.B. Yeats, The Song of the Happy Shepherd grep -r kibo / "Movements are the problem, not the answer to problems." _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss