[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Re: Nweek 55 votes

[S Archer <skarcher2003@xxxxxxxxx>]

> >Proposal 1733/0: No thanks, I'm full (Wonko)
> 
> No, absolutely not.  But it would make sense to
> remove eclairs from the
> ruleset on detection.
> BTW, I don't think my smearing of Nomvivor has been
> recognised.

I agree, eclairs are always thing which are broken. I
was disappointed that style was not completely sweared
though


> >Proposal 1742/0: Quote prop by Sagitta (The 
> Administrator)
> 
> Yes.  *crackle*  I left the author and date out of 
> the braces
> delimiting the proposal - the date has made it in, 
> but not BvS's name.
> Perhaps this could be modified by administrative 
> fiat?
> And another yes from my Plotting Radical vote, as 
> *crackle* an
> experiment to see whether this counts as one of my 
> own proposals.

As far as I can see, it would... Quote props need to
be made a form of strict poll (r 15b)

of more interest though is that all of the quote props
on this ballot are listed as unauthored props, when
r396 makes no mention of Unauthored props and rule 19
clearly states that Unauthored props have no passage
bonus or failure penalty, which Quote props do have


> >Proposal 1749/0: Declaration Of Extreme Cleverness
> (Sagitta)
> 
> As the scam didn't work, I cannot in good faith vote
> for this proposal.
> Therefore I vote for it in bad faith, in the hope of
> getting a contrary
> vote point.  Plus I aint seen one good lynching in
> years.

I'm touched, really I am, by your obvious
understanding of the game. How long have you been a
spectator?

> >Proposal 1752/0: Quote Prop by Zarpint (Zarpint)
> 
> Shelve.  I'll vote Yes if the Minister of Quotes
> promises to include
> the delimiters.

hmmmm

> In my *crackle* capacity as the Style police, I note
> that several
> unusually stylish proposals have been submitted. 
> 1733 has the virtues
> of brevity and poetic form, 1734 blights the card
> game wonderfully,
> 1743 is both utilitarian and vindictive, 1755 is
> briefly amusing.  Best
> of all is *buzz* 1752, creatively exploiting the
> prop syntax to comment
> archly on the body of the quotation.  And it's
> short.
> 

Did I actually mention that I was drinking Scotch that

night, or was that just a guess on Zarpints part?



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss