RE: [spoon-discuss] RE: [Spoon-business] Prop: I never liked thatoneanyway

["Baron von Skippy" <bvs@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>> > > I propose:
>> > > {{
>> > > __I never likes that one anyway__
>> > >
>> > > Replace rule 1082 with:
>> > > {{
>> > >
>> > > There exist objects called T-shirts. T-shirts may have text on
>> > > them. T-shirts
>> > > may only be created or modified as described in the rules. All
>> > > T-Shirts are
>> > > held by a player; if one if not, it is destroyed.
>> > >
>> > > A T-Shirt may be Burned by the player holding it. When a T-Shirt
>> > > is Burned, it
>> > > is destroyed.
>> > > }}
>> > >
>> > > }}
>> >
>> > Change the first sentence to "There may exist objects called 
>> T-shirts." and
>> > I will vote for it, otherwise I'll vote shelve. Required existence can
>> > cause odd things like people trying to pull T shirts out of mid air...
>> > allowed existence is better, IMHO
>> 
>> I change the first sentence in the above proposal to:
>> {{
>> There may exist objects called T-shirts.
>> }}
>> 
>> I also change the title to __I never liked that one anyway__
>> [[ Typo ]]
>> 
>
>Thank you. 
>
>You might also want to change 
>"All T-Shirts are held by a player; if one if not, it is destroyed."
>
>to
>
>"All T-Shirts are held by a player; if one IS not, it is destroyed."
>
-How about "if a T-Shirt is not held by a player, it is destroyed?" Just a little grammar nitpick.-
>
>I will be altering my prop about T Shirts to something else later on
>
[[BvS]]
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss