Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Gutting the Carcass

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

19/07/2003 00:10:35, "Anything McGee" <anythingmcgee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>Hmm, it isn't explictly stated, but in r15 (Voting)
>><snip>
>>Its not explict, but it is definite. I think I feel a prop coming on to make it explicit
>
>I took it out of the proposal, so this is all hypothetical now.  Still, though, I wouldn't say it's definite.
>

No, it is a bit wolly, needs a fix

>Nowhere does it say that the proposal's failure precludes passage of sections dependent upon failure, as your prop will do.  (I support your prop, by the way.)
>
It is one of those grey areas.

>I have a feeling that, had I not amended the prop and it failed, Mr. Administrator would have vetoed the repeal and it would have gone on to a CFI.  It almost 
tempts me to try a prop like that before your rule takes effect.

I was tempted to put a 'if this prop fails accord SkArcher a win' clause in my prop for fun :)

>
>That miniature controversy was fun.  Next, I'll show you how to become your own grandfather using three Speeders and a Siren.

Speeder? Siren? I know not of these things - not since Wonko nuked the grid anyway ;)


SkArcher 


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss