Anything McGee on 18 Jul 2003 23:11:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Gutting the Carcass |
>Hmm, it isn't explictly stated, but in r15 (Voting) ><snip> >Its not explict, but it is definite. I think I feel a prop coming on to make it explicit I took it out of the proposal, so this is all hypothetical now. Still, though, I wouldn't say it's definite. Nowhere does it say that the proposal's failure precludes passage of sections dependent upon failure, as your prop will do. (I support your prop, by the way.) I have a feeling that, had I not amended the prop and it failed, Mr. Administrator would have vetoed the repeal and it would have gone on to a CFI. It almost tempts me to try a prop like that before your rule takes effect. That miniature controversy was fun. Next, I'll show you how to become your own grandfather using three Speeders and a Siren. Anything M. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss