Re: [spoon-discuss] Subgame?

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 02:17  PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:

> > > > How does this look for a start?
> > >
> > > Sounds too complex for the state of the game right now.
> >
> > Most of the complexity is simply a roundabout way of saying, "Let's 
> > pretend we're taking turns and have cards!"
> >
> > The game I'm trying to create is Dvorak, which can be described in 99 
> > words:
> >
> > Shuffle the cards into a draw pile.
> >  Draw five cards each. Choose who takes the first turn.
> >  Each turn, draw a card from the top of the draw pile, then play a 
> > Thing and/or an Action. (Things go onto the table in front of the 
> > person who played them, Actions go face-up onto the discard pile.)
> >   If you've got more than five cards in your hand at the end of your 
> > turn, discard down to five. Then it's the next Player's turn.
> >   When the draw pile's empty, shuffle the discard pile to make a new 
> > one.
> >   And that's it.
> -Well,it might work, if it wouldn't take weeks at a time to go through 
> rounds, anyway. Have you played this game often/ can you give us some 
> examples of the kinds of things that go on the cards?-

I've never played, but I can direct you to a sample deck: 
http://www.dvorakgame.co.uk/cardlist.cgi?timecube

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss