Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Distributed Responsibility

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

26/06/2003 02:18:37, bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:37 pm, SkArcher wrote:
>> Create the following rule;
>
>You propose the following rule:
>
>> {{__Duties__
>> [[This rule is intended to reduce the workload caused by the excessive
>> number of things that need doing on the admin. The idea is to put the
>> responsibility for doing things upon the players, but in a much more
>> distributed fashion than the current Ministers system, which is prone to
>> problems if a Minister just ups and disappears.]]
>/* ... */
>> A.3. A Duty may be deactivated. Duties may only come to be deactivated as
>> laid down explicitly in the rules, or by direct proposition. A Deactivated
>> Duty may not become Waiting, or Require Attention. Should any Deactivated
>> Duties try to become Waiting, or Require Attention, they do not. Only a
>> Proposal may alter the state of a Deactivated Proposal. This section of
>
>Deactivated Duty.
>

I ammend the proposal to replace 'Deactivated Proposal' with 'Deactivated Duty' in section A.3. 
Thanks bd

>> this rule takes precedence over all other rules that may change the state
>> of Duties.
>
># SNIP
>
>Nice, and the only problems are Rectifiable.
>
>- -- 
>bd
>Why was I born with such contemporaries?
>		-- Oscar Wilde
 


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss