[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Distributed Responsibility

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 08:37  PM, SkArcher wrote:

> Create the following rule;
>
> {{__Duties__

> B. All Duties must be listed within the text of this rule, for ease of 
> reference, and if a Duty is
> specifically related to another rule then a reference or link to that 
> rule must be provided. Any Duty which
> is not listed within the text of this rule is not a Duty, even if it 
> claims to be so. This rule takes
> precedence over all other rules for the purposes of defining Duties.
>
> D. The following is the current list of Duties;

> }}

I don't like this bit. I greatly prefer having things in separate 
rules, if for no better reason than that it makes writing code to 
change things easier, since repealing/creating a new Duty means simply 
deleting/making a new database entry.

If it were required that all Duties be defined in rules with the 
keyword Duty, the same functionality would be provided, but without the 
need for one absurdly long rule.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss