bd on 22 Jun 2003 18:13:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Proxy Fixes |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 22 June 2003 02:39 am, Daniel Lepage wrote: > On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 01:47 AM, Adam Hill wrote: > > --- "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I don't buy that. If a bunch of people vote together, it overwhelms > >> everyone anyway. If a bunch of people arrange to vote together via > >> the actions of a single person, that's not different from everyone > >> voting together. The giving of proxies has to be done on the public > >> forum, and the possession of proxies is recorded on the roster. It's > >> not something that's going to accidentally sneak up on people. If > >> someone has a majority of votes through proxy, it's because a > >> majority of people are willing to vote all the same way. > >> > >> Glotmorf > > > > Yes, but that's assuming that a proxy giver agrees completely with the > > proxy receiver, which is practically impossible. For example, bd and > > I usually vote the same way, so if I needed to proxy I would proxy to > > em. But there are always going to be votes where bd and I disagree. > > If everyone gives their votes to bd, and bd doesn't agree with all of > > those people on one particular vote out of many, then that screws up > > the majority system. It doesn't mean that there's an alliance, or > > that bd is scheming; it means that popular opinion gives way to > > compromised opinion. The one-proxy-per-person rule is standard in > > legislative arenas, and I think it would work better in our paradigm > > as well. > > But even with your prop in place, people will still be able to "give" > their proxies to people already having them using automation scripts. > Also, your prop would mean that I could stop you from giving your proxy > to bd by giving him mine; I'd still be able to override any votes e > cast for me, so I wouldn't lose anything, and meanwhile your proxy > would be wasted. I think we should get rid of Automation Scripts entirely - they're too much work. - -- bd Yeah, there are more important things in life than money, but they won't go out with you if you don't have any. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+9e9vx533NjVSos4RAq6oAKCGVPzz0u/V5o+BLE8kAwc4dDc0NACfQoLR EHl+T9zx46B9o11qECZvRg4= =6Inm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss