bd on 23 May 2003 18:35:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Um, why? |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 22 May 2003 09:12 pm, Baron von Skippy wrote: > > >You used your ring. You can't unilaterally block it anymore ;) > > > >I don't loose the ring just because i've used it > > > >The reason I blocked it was because It WON'T become a public source of > > cans of whoopass - Whoever > >gets to it first (bearing in mind we would all be in Limbo) would be able > >to buy it and then they > >would have teh monopoly. > > > >I think that maybe the players should go out and build them where they > > want 'em, not make it a race > >to see who posts first > > -Well, if it passes, then there are three Monoliths out there for the > taking, not one, and a trilateral monopoly isn't nearly as threatening. And > nowhere did I put in a piece: "Players may not make Monoliths any more, so > they'd better run for those three." I might also point out that I stand to > gain nothing from this. I am a penguinchu thing, if you'll recall. So this > is in no way selfish, it simply boils down to a need for Whoopass to get > this game moving in what I see as the right direction.- How about having it explicitly assigning them to random players (not On leave, of course) - -- bd So much depends upon a red wheel barrow glazed with rain water beside the white chickens. -- William Carlos Williams, "The Red Wheel Barrow" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+zmmcx533NjVSos4RAtZQAJ9IOz+RRVG+tu/JDdWA8wrbjSGtpACgja3J g13wFWc4JZ4maqDh4kljyyc= =0ne8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss