bd on 22 May 2003 23:25:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Um, why? |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 22 May 2003 07:17 pm, SkArcher wrote: > 23/05/2003 00:11:53, "Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>Ever heard the term monopoly? > >> > > >> >-Ever heard the term "politics?" Admitting that you're just out for > >> > >>control > >> > >> >was a Bad Idea (TM)...- > >> > >>as opposed to the fact that your proposal would turn into a race to be > >> the one who owned the entropy harvester, > >>because 'The owner of a Harvester may cause a Can of Whoopass possessed > >> by said Harvester to be moved to any > >>location adjacent to the Harvester by declaring so in a Public Forum' > >> > >>and thats to say nothing of the fact that you tried to do exactly the > >> same thing only 2 nweeks ago :) > > > >-Excuse me? I tried to build a Monolith, like ANYONE had the power to do. > >YOU are trying to prevent me from making them publicly available for a low > >price, since you want to have a stranglehold on the market. I never > > planned to stop other people, I just wanted to get my own Power Plant > > going. There's a world of difference here. Now let my prop through, > > m'kay?- > > No. I'm not going to stop other people from building them (indeed I can't) > but no silly shortcuts. You want one, get a rock and some gnomes. > > And until such time as someone else does, then i'll have the only one You used your ring. You can't unilaterally block it anymore ;) - -- bd MS-DOS, you can't live with it, you can live without it. -- from Lars Wirzenius' .sig -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+zVwcx533NjVSos4RAsFXAKCwPRuU0wh+W/7yKw+rImhPvvcE0gCbB5DN fKyxZbbfOkdFdCVW+eMHi2k= =dcol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss