Re: [spoon-discuss] Testing....

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday, May 4, 2003, at 10:03  PM, Glotmorf wrote:

> On 5/4/03 at 9:50 PM bd wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sunday 04 May 2003 09:54 pm, Glotmorf wrote:
> > > On 5/4/03 at 9:40 PM bd wrote:
> > > > > > -What I can't figure out is why you need any more than today's
> > messages
> > > > > > kicking around. What possible use is it to have the last 10,000
> > > > > > messages hanging around?-
> > > > >
> > > > > Ask me about that ten nweeks from now.  I'll pull up this message 
> > > > > and
> > > >
> > > > show
> > > >
> > > > > you.
> > > >
> > > > Um, if it's not to much to ask, could you and BvS get your clocks
> > > > consistent?
> > > > It's really confusing to get them in the wrong order like that.
> > >
> > > It's probably not a clock thang.  I'm just now responding to
> > > the...gawd...49 emails that were waiting for me.
> >
> > No, BvS' reply to one of your messages had an earlier timestamp. The 
> > one I
> > replied to was it, incidentally.
>
> Well, my system clock is about eight minutes fast right now...but that 
> doesn't explain how your reply to my earlier message came "before" my 
> earlier message...:)

Some mailers sort by what time the message is timestamped... that 
depends on the time of its computer. I believe that bd would have 
similar problems if I set my computer's clock to 1853.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss