bd on 5 May 2003 19:31:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Testing.... |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 04 May 2003 10:03 pm, Glotmorf wrote: > On 5/4/03 at 9:50 PM bd wrote: > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >On Sunday 04 May 2003 09:54 pm, Glotmorf wrote: > >> On 5/4/03 at 9:40 PM bd wrote: > >> >> >-What I can't figure out is why you need any more than today's > > > >messages > > > >> >> >kicking around. What possible use is it to have the last 10,000 > >> >> > messages hanging around?- > >> >> > >> >> Ask me about that ten nweeks from now. I'll pull up this message and > >> > > >> >show > >> > > >> >> you. > >> > > >> >Um, if it's not to much to ask, could you and BvS get your clocks > >> >consistent? > >> >It's really confusing to get them in the wrong order like that. > >> > >> It's probably not a clock thang. I'm just now responding to > >> the...gawd...49 emails that were waiting for me. > > > >No, BvS' reply to one of your messages had an earlier timestamp. The one I > >replied to was it, incidentally. > > Well, my system clock is about eight minutes fast right now...but that > doesn't explain how your reply to my earlier message came "before" my > earlier message...:) My client auto-sorts, so yes, it does. Anyway, I suggest you check out network time protocol, unless you use a modem. - -- bd "It's ten o'clock... Do you know where your AI programs are?" -- Peter Oakley -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+trvSx533NjVSos4RAvXkAKCkyXTWWb+iyIZcymrJKfwhoF8TjACgxzkz fDAq4c3yesafz4vF5cW1DtQ= =DDiJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss