bd on 11 Apr 2003 19:36:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Nomic relations |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 April 2003 10:28 pm, Baron von Skippy wrote: > >I said before that the proposed rule was too general, too vague, and tried > >to do too much with those general, vague terms. Wonko, I think, has the > >same objections, but finds specific problems. > > > >I think the solution is to not try to build this giant structure with > >Subers and object limitations and such; instead, we should do each > >interaction with another nomic as a custom job. Maybe trade a few items > >with one. Maybe have interactions in another, not trading, but > >cause-effect things, like whenever Whoopass explodes here, it does > >something to another nomic. Other stuff. But each time it should be done > >with each nomic as a completly custom job. > > > >My 2¢. > > > >Orc in a Spacesuit > > -I'm almost willing to agree, so keep talking. Just answer me one thing. > What happens when they steal our rules and make our stuff for next to > nothing, to spite us? Answer me that and I'll go over to your way of > thinking. Say "we crush them with great justice," and I'll pretend I never > suggested the idea in the first place.- We can't do anything. Any other nomic can choose to exclude us from their universe entirely. - -- bd You get what you pay for. -- Gabriel Biel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+lxjtx533NjVSos4RAiY9AJ0QJ5yp163v2PqdC0So6nCtVzLOIgCgvG2k Ak0kMwhOv5pgy20KLxgKhr4= =bIrz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss