Daniel Lepage on 2 Apr 2003 01:05:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Prop 1418 |
On Monday, March 31, 2003, at 11:03 PM, Glotmorf wrote:
Baron...you might want to put a conditional on here, in case p1407 passes, since it would mean all this stuff will get destroyed in the event of a win.I should think having an unpowered improvement be deactivated would be better than scrapped. The average RL factory wouldn't go into meltdown if it had no power. Perhaps a systemwide brownout is another alternative.
Deactivation would be a pain - who decides which would get destroyed? Better might be simply to have the plant try anyway; roll 1d5, add the number of improvements being powered beyond the limit; if this number is greater than, say, 3, the power plant melts down, Whoopassing it and neighboring squares.
Should service malls have unowned landing zones? I know Elbonian Airways is far more concerned with takeoff than landing, but > still...:)
I think we should drop unowned landing zones entirely. Make people build 'em if they want troops. Mostly, I don't like the idea of buying lots of land, but having an unowned LZ in the middle of my fortress.
-- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss