Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Prop: layers

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:11 am, Baron von Skippy wrote:
> > >>{{ _Layers_
> > >
> > >I fail to see any difference between this and chutzpah.  This is just
> > >another chutzpah.  People can do extreme layers too.
> >
> >The difference is that chutzpah should indicate the general importance of
> > a rule within that rule's class, whereas some classes of rules should
> > always be more important.  Rules controlling the voting process, for
> > example, should be at a higher layer than grid rules, but some voting
> > rules are more important than other voting rules, and some grid rules are
> > more important than other grid rules.
> >
> >Plus, it shouldn't be necessary to do extreme layers.  The layers concept
> >should be that if a rule is more important than all rules in its layer, it
> >should be bumped up a layer.  If it's not as important as the layer
> >immediately above, a new layer should be created.
>
> -Ooh, I know. Add something like "No rule may be assigned a layer with a
> value greater than one higher than the current highest layer in existence."
> That way, extreme layers are totally impossible.-

Put a rule in the highest layer with higher precedence overriding it (and 
removing the don't create and destroy in the same prop restriction) and then 
create a new one. Simple.
- -- 
bd
Nothing ever becomes real until it is experienced.
- - John Keats
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+IXZBNc3bwymw/OwRAk0CAJ9JxxPWIvAjLZt2Wh+ezN60vmq/+ACfehWW
Frzqu1Rg/AEQXPiID+ZecM8=
=iaWF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss