Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Prop: layers

["Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >>{{ _Layers_
> >
> >I fail to see any difference between this and chutzpah.  This is just
> >another chutzpah.  People can do extreme layers too.
>
> The difference is that chutzpah should indicate the general importance of a 
> rule within that rule's class, whereas some classes of rules should always 
> be more important.  Rules controlling the voting process, for example, 
> should be at a higher layer than grid rules, but some voting rules are more 
> important than other voting rules, and some grid rules are more important 
> than other grid rules.
>
> Plus, it shouldn't be necessary to do extreme layers.  The layers concept 
> should be that if a rule is more important than all rules in its layer, it 
> should be bumped up a layer.  If it's not as important as the layer 
> immediately above, a new layer should be created.

-Ooh, I know. Add something like "No rule may be assigned a layer with a 
value greater than one higher than the current highest layer in existence." 
That way, extreme layers are totally impossible.-

[[BvS]]

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss