Orc In A Spacesuit on 14 Nov 2002 20:27:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] proposal change |
From: bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Thursday 14 November 2002 02:58 pm, Glotmorf wrote: > On 11/14/02 at 2:48 PM bd wrote: > >On Wednesday 13 November 2002 10:13 pm, Glotmorf wrote:> >> If a change to a proposal results in a proposal that would require more> >> bandwidth than before the change, the proposing entity's bandwidth is> >> further decreased to compensate for it; if this would take the proposing > >> entity's bandwidth below zero, the change is not made. If a change to a> >> proposal results in a lower bandwidth requirement, the difference in > >> bandwidth is returned to the proposing entity. > > > >Email 1: > >I create a proposal with the following text: > >{{ > >__jack__ > >all wORk aNN n0 plaa makesjack a DULL BOY. > >}} > > This makes a one-bandwidth proposal, since it changes no rules. > > >Email 2: > > > >I alter my last proposal, repeating its text 5000 times. > > The proposal remains a one-bandwidth proposal, since it still changes no > rules. Fine. just make 20000 rules or so. > >Email 3: > > > >I replace my last proposal with $realproposal. > > This makes a proposal with bandwidth dependent on $realproposal. > > And this accomplished what, exactly? Email 1 uses 1 bandwith. Email 2 brings it below zero, and you prop beringsthat to zero. Then we go down to a reasonable value, and an overall profit ismade. -- bd The door is the key.
Huh? I think you are going to need to spell it out. "Email 2 brings it below zero"? What are you talking about?
Orc In A Spacesuit _________________________________________________________________Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
_______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss