bd on 19 Sep 2002 22:08:04 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 22 VOTING RESULTS |
On Thursday 19 September 2002 05:53 pm, Wonko wrote: > As for the first, the existing rule does not say that going public is a > prerequisite for existence of Stocks, it only says that going public > creates stocks. That doesn't affect stocks that already exist. CFIs don't have to be true. They just have to be *ruled* TRUE. :-P > So how about I do this: I issue a proposal to give me the hundred thou, I > don't use my shareholder power except to push that proposal through (and > maybe one or two of my other ones? ;), and, as part of the proposal, I > dispose of all my shares? I'd basically be just using Glotmorf's proposal > to undo the damage done to my by Glotmorf's proposal. Does that sound fair? How about someone says TRUE to my CFI? That fixes things nicely, even though it is a perversion of the judicial system :) -- bd BOFH Excuse #267: The UPS is on strike. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss