Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 22 VOTING RESULTS

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth bd,

> On Thursday 19 September 2002 05:53 pm, Wonko wrote:
> 
>> As for the first, the existing rule does not say that going public is a
>> prerequisite for existence of Stocks, it only says that going public
>> creates stocks. That doesn't affect stocks that already exist.
> 
> CFIs don't have to be true. They just have to be *ruled* TRUE. :-P
> 
>> So how about I do this: I issue a proposal to give me the hundred thou, I
>> don't use my shareholder power except to push that proposal through (and
>> maybe one or two of my other ones? ;), and, as part of the proposal, I
>> dispose of all my shares? I'd basically be just using Glotmorf's proposal
>> to undo the damage done to my by Glotmorf's proposal. Does that sound fair?
> 
> How about someone says TRUE to my CFI? That fixes things nicely, even though
> it is a perversion of the judicial system :)

Except it will fail. For the same reason Uin's old "I and the judge of this
proposal can change the gamestate at will" CFI failed. Regardless of how
it's judged. CFI's can't contradict something which is true.

-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss