Wonko on 19 Sep 2002 22:00:05 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 22 VOTING RESULTS |
Quoth Glotmorf, > On 9/18/02 at 11:27 PM Wonko wrote: > >> Quoth Glotmorf, >> >>> On 9/18/02 at 11:59 PM David E. Smith wrote: >>> >>>> Proposal 965/0 (Night of the Living Dead Stock Market) (M-Tek): >>>> AFF: bd, Glotmorf, Iain, Squire of Dimness >>>> NEG: Mithrandir, The Voice, Wonko >>>> Counts (Y/N/A/S) : (4-3-0-0). Measure passes. >>>> Measure is vetoed by The Administrator (technically infeasible >>>> to implement. There were other, legal BNS transactions, and I simply >>>> CANNOT sort out which is which, especially in light of the fact that >>>> this nweek lasted almost a month of RL time). >>>> M-Tek scores 9 points. >>>> >>>> Proposal 973/0 (Public Exposure) (Glotmorf): >>>> AFF: bd, Glotmorf, Mithrandir, Squire of Dimness >>>> NEG: Wonko >>>> ABS: The Voice >>>> Counts (Y/N/A/S) : (4-1-1-0). Measure passes. >>>> Created 946/2. >>>> Created massive ambiguity, as Wonko now has stock in lots of players >>>> who have not yet Gone Public. >>>> [[ I can't tell you how tempting it is to veto this... ]] >>>> Glotmorf scores 8 points. >>> >>> I'd just like to point out that the "massive ambiguity" as a result of >> p973 >>> wouldn't be present except for the veto of p965. The whole point of >> p965 was >>> to make existing stock holdings go away. Are you SURE you can't >> implement it? >> >> I don't see any 'massive ambiguity' here: the rule doesn't say I can't own >> shares of other players who haven't gone public, just that I can't buy >> them. >> As it is, I now own 100% of the shares in every player save myself. This >> means, according to Glotmorf's new rule, that I have absolute control over >> everybody's votes. > > Can I have an "I told you so" from the congregation? > > Given the failure of my rollback proposal, which apparently Mr. A would have > vetoed anyway, Wonko is left in possession of alleged player stocks, which > allegedly give em control over voting. The way I see it, there are three > options: > > - Mr. A could interpret the stocks in Wonko's possession to be nonexistent, > since the existing rule says players must go public in order for there to be > player stocks, and none of the players have done so. If necessary, someone > could compose a CFI to that effect. > > - Wonko could, in keeping with eir generous act of returning all the money, > abandon any claim as to the legitimacy of eir alleged player stocks. > > - We can have another stinkin' state of emergency, which would tie the game up > for another ten days or so. > > Personally, I consider any claim of legitimacy for Wonko's player stocks to be > at least 95% bogus, but if the first two possibilities aren't explored, I > suspect the SOE would be necessary. As for the first, the existing rule does not say that going public is a prerequisite for existence of Stocks, it only says that going public creates stocks. That doesn't affect stocks that already exist. As for the third, SOE's are really irritating. Besides, I can set people's votes on any "ballot issue"; the refresh proposals are put on a "Ballot"; therefore, I control emergency proposals as well, and a SOE would do no good. Which then brings us to option two. I don't see any way in the ruleset that I can legally just 'abandon' all my shares. I can, however, sell them at the Bank's price. Selling them was my original intention anyway - I didn't expect Glotmorf's proposal to pass. So I plan to sell all those shares, and regain the 100,000 or so BNS I invested in the first place to avoid being bumped all the way down to a measly 500. Except that a vast portion of that 100 thou (95000 of, to be precise) was in proposal stock, which Glotmorf, for reasons unbeknownst to me, obliterated with eir proposal. So how about I do this: I issue a proposal to give me the hundred thou, I don't use my shareholder power except to push that proposal through (and maybe one or two of my other ones? ;), and, as part of the proposal, I dispose of all my shares? I'd basically be just using Glotmorf's proposal to undo the damage done to my by Glotmorf's proposal. Does that sound fair? -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss