| Baron von Skippy baronvonskippy on Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:40:19 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule |
> >-Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in
> >implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules the
> >same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it. So
> >it
> >seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event of
> >a
> >conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 wins
> >out over Rule 33.-
>
>Move an existing rule into Rule #33, and you get a brand spankin' new
>version of Rule #33. Which means it's Rule 33/<old revision number> + 1.
>
>No conflict.
>
> Glotmorf
>
-Hoping you're agreeing that I've found a hole, I'll push that to a
conclusion- And as that's not amending it, either, it's legal under the
rule's own text. Yay.-
[[BvS]]
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com