Baron von Skippy baronvonskippy on Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:40:19 -0400

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule

> >-Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in
> >implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules the
> >same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it. So
> >it
> >seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event of
> >a
> >conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 wins
> >out over Rule 33.-
>Move an existing rule into Rule #33, and you get a brand spankin' new 
>version of Rule #33.  Which means it's Rule 33/<old revision number> + 1.
>No conflict.
>						Glotmorf
-Hoping you're agreeing that I've found a hole, I'll push that to a 
conclusion- And as that's not amending it, either, it's legal under the 
rule's own text. Yay.-


Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: