Baron von Skippy baronvonskippy on Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:40:19 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule |
> >-Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in > >implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules the > >same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it. So > >it > >seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event of > >a > >conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 wins > >out over Rule 33.- > >Move an existing rule into Rule #33, and you get a brand spankin' new >version of Rule #33. Which means it's Rule 33/<old revision number> + 1. > >No conflict. > > Glotmorf > -Hoping you're agreeing that I've found a hole, I'll push that to a conclusion- And as that's not amending it, either, it's legal under the rule's own text. Yay.- [[BvS]] _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com