Baron von Skippy baronvonskippy on Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:44:05 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule |
> > >-Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in > > >implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules >the > > >same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it. >So > > >it > > >seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event >of > > >a > > >conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 >wins > > >out over Rule 33.- > > > > Move an existing rule into Rule #33, and you get a brand spankin' new > > version of Rule #33. Which means it's Rule 33/<old revision number> + >1. > > > > No conflict. > >Can't be renumbered with the new version. > >-- >bd >Kettering's Observation: > Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence. > -Is that really renumbering? It's still Rule 33.- [[BvS]] _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx