bd bdonlan on Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:39:57 -0400

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule

On Thursday 29 August 2002 02:50 am, Glotmorf wrote:
> On 8/28/02 at 9:33 PM Baron von Skippy wrote:
> >-Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in
> >implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules t=
> >same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it.=
> >it
> >seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event=
> >a
> >conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 w=
> >out over Rule 33.-
> Move an existing rule into Rule #33, and you get a brand spankin' new
> version of Rule #33.  Which means it's Rule 33/<old revision number> + =
> No conflict.

Can't be renumbered with the new version.

Kettering's Observation:
=09Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence.