|bd bdonlan on Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:39:57 -0400|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|[BNomic-Public] Re: [Bnomic-private] Cont: Immutable rule|
On Thursday 29 August 2002 02:50 am, Glotmorf wrote: > On 8/28/02 at 9:33 PM Baron von Skippy wrote: > >-Well, begging Dave's pardon, I'm looking for loopholes, not ease in > >implementation. That said, no it isn't. I'm trying to give two rules t= he > >same serial number. So they can't both have it. So one has to lose it.= So > >it > >seems reasonable that the two are in conflict, yes? Well, in the event= of > >a > >conflict, the lower-numbered gets precedence for the slot, so Rule 1 w= ins > >out over Rule 33.- > > Move an existing rule into Rule #33, and you get a brand spankin' new > version of Rule #33. Which means it's Rule 33/<old revision number> + = 1. > > No conflict. Can't be renumbered with the new version. --=20 bd Kettering's Observation: =09Logic is an organized way of going wrong with confidence.