Re: [spoon-discuss] Less Is More: Proposals

["Baron von Skippy" <baronvonskippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry if I already sent this... I hadn't finished yet, and I hit the button 
anyway. It's late. Leeme lone.

> Can anyone see any flaws in this?
>
> {{
> __Less is More: Proposals__
>
> Create the following rule:
> {{
> __Less is More: Proposals__
>
> If rule A conflicts with this rule, and A does not specify precedence over
> this rule, this rule takes precedence over rule A, unless rule A is rule 0.

-There's your first mistake. Since there's no "Rule A," those sentences do 
nothing. How about "If any rule conflicts with this rule, does not take 
precedence over this rule, and is not Rule 0, this rule takes precedence 
over that rule."-

> Comment text shall not have the force of Rule; its purpose is solely 
> elucidative or demonstrative.

-Not a problem with this proposal, but that sentence makes "story-rules" 
mildly illegal. The text around one of those props is hardly "elucidative or 
demonstrative." Is that a problem for anyone?-

> If the proposal was submitted by the player named "bd", it >automatically 
> passes.
>
> The player named "bd" may veto proposals in the same way as the 
> >Administrator, but without the requirement of not being a Player.
>
> If a proposal would have passed, but is deemed failed *only* due to the
> Administrator's veto or bd's veto, then:

-Gee, we're a little hopeful no one actually reads these things, aren't we? 
Good try, but... how about not?-

                                           -BvS-

-P.S. Don't make me kick your ass. That's not the same as giving you a Kick 
in the Ass, mind you.-


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss