Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)

["The Voice" <nomicvoice0@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal  (revision)
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 08:43:53 -0400
>
> On 6/21/02 at 8:38 AM The Voice wrote:
>
> >>From: "David E. Smith" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> >>To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal
> >>(revision)
> >>Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:52:54 +0000 (GMT)
> >>
> >>On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Glotmorf wrote:
> >>
> >> > I don't think we ever established a proposal retraction rule.  The
> >>standard method is to replace it with something either constructive and
> >>totally different or totally bonzoid and ineffectual.
> >> >
> >> > What was it Bean used...?
> >> >
> >> > "All points this proposal earns are donated to the Gremlin Fund."
> >>
> >>I think Bean's also dropped eir Charm by one, to balance out the other
> >>effect of the passage. (I don't think we had things like Entropy then.)
> >>
> >>It shouldn't be too hard to come up with something useful, or at least
> >>not-too-harmful, to do with an extra proposal. There's always stuff to 
> do!
> >>
> >>...dave
> >
> >Or, we could just all vote SHELVE...
>
> We could do that, yes.  But...what if we don't want the rule at all? :)
>
> 						Glotmorf


Well... I think I'm in that camp as well.  I would still like to remind 
everyone of all the options.


-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss