Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/21/02 at 8:38 AM The Voice wrote:

>>From: "David E. Smith" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal
>>(revision)
>>Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:52:54 +0000 (GMT)
>>
>>On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Glotmorf wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think we ever established a proposal retraction rule.  The
>>standard method is to replace it with something either constructive and
>>totally different or totally bonzoid and ineffectual.
>> >
>> > What was it Bean used...?
>> >
>> > "All points this proposal earns are donated to the Gremlin Fund."
>>
>>I think Bean's also dropped eir Charm by one, to balance out the other
>>effect of the passage. (I don't think we had things like Entropy then.)
>>
>>It shouldn't be too hard to come up with something useful, or at least
>>not-too-harmful, to do with an extra proposal. There's always stuff to do!
>>
>>...dave
>
>Or, we could just all vote SHELVE...

We could do that, yes.  But...what if we don't want the rule at all? :)

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss