Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)

["The Voice" <nomicvoice0@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: "David E. Smith" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal   
> (revision)
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 03:52:54 +0000 (GMT)
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Glotmorf wrote:
>
> > I don't think we ever established a proposal retraction rule.  The 
> standard method is to replace it with something either constructive and 
> totally different or totally bonzoid and ineffectual.
> >
> > What was it Bean used...?
> >
> > "All points this proposal earns are donated to the Gremlin Fund."
>
> I think Bean's also dropped eir Charm by one, to balance out the other
> effect of the passage. (I don't think we had things like Entropy then.)
>
> It shouldn't be too hard to come up with something useful, or at least
> not-too-harmful, to do with an extra proposal. There's always stuff to do!
>
> ...dave

Or, we could just all vote SHELVE...


-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss