Dan Waldron on 18 Jun 2002 22:57:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Nearest location |
> The 'nearest location' is not explicitly defined anywhere. Do we want another > near-crisis like the DimShips again? But we have a means for calculating distance. "Nearest" is commonly used to mean "least distance". Since our usage of "nearest location" exactly coincides with the standard English usage, and that standard English usage is pretty clear, we don't need to seperately define it. "Nearest location" is in the same category as "automated script", "dice roll", "transfer", "email address", "integer", or any number of other things understood without an explicit definition. There are a few words that we should define because they are used in ways different from the standard English usage. Try any of these: "object", "entity", "ballot", "document", or "attribute". Dan Waldron _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss