Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (here we go)

["The Voice" <nomicvoice0@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (here we go)
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:14:18 -0400
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:56:58AM -0400, Dan Waldron wrote:
> > I need you all to adapt your proposals to work with this.
>
> I'd rather not, thanks.
>
> Sorry, but I plan to vote against your proposal. This proposal makes
> more of a drastic change to the game than the initial Ruleset, and I
> remember quite well how messed up that was. I like the idea, but it
> would need to be implemented in small steps.
>
> > Any rule that deals with gremlins, gnomes, or the like _has_ to be a
> > physical law, since mutable rules will not apply to non-beings.
>
> Arbitrary limitations like that are what scare me.
> --
> Rob Speer
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Whether or not you plan to vote against it, it would still be a good idea to 
do what he says-- if they all pass, then we have some rules that we don't 
have categorizations for... that would probably be a Bad Thing (TM).

-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss