Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (here we go)

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/18/02 at 4:21 PM The Voice wrote:

>>From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (here we go)
>>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:14:18 -0400
>>
>>On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:56:58AM -0400, Dan Waldron wrote:
>> > I need you all to adapt your proposals to work with this.
>>
>>I'd rather not, thanks.
>>
>>Sorry, but I plan to vote against your proposal. This proposal makes
>>more of a drastic change to the game than the initial Ruleset, and I
>>remember quite well how messed up that was. I like the idea, but it
>>would need to be implemented in small steps.
>>
>> > Any rule that deals with gremlins, gnomes, or the like _has_ to be a
>> > physical law, since mutable rules will not apply to non-beings.
>>
>>Arbitrary limitations like that are what scare me.
>>--
>>Rob Speer
>
>Whether or not you plan to vote against it, it would still be a good idea
>to
>do what he says-- if they all pass, then we have some rules that we don't
>have categorizations for... that would probably be a Bad Thing (TM).
>
>-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0-

Then the rule that causes other rules to not have categorizations should have some provision for categorizing them.  This would be a Good Thing.

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss