Re: [spoon-discuss] Nearest location

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 18 June 2002 1:14 pm, Dan Waldron wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, bd wrote:
> > Here's a proposal suggestion, let me know what you think.
> >
> > Create the following proposal:
> > {{
> > Create the following rule:
> > {{
>
> Under the new system of physical laws and mutable rules this will need to
> be a physical law.  Since the default new rule is mutable you will need to
> specify that it will be a physical law. Instead of:
>
> "Create the following rule:"
>
> you might put:
>
> "Create the following physical law:"
>
> or, at the end of the proposal you might put:
>
> "if 'Introducing Physical Law' passed, make the rule enacted by this
> proposal a physical law."

Ok. BTW, this is because numerous rules refer to the 'nearest' location 
without saying what that location is. This solves that, and add a random 
tiebreaker.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss