Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Prop change

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 14 May 2002 01:59 pm, you wrote:
> uin wrote:
> > Rule 155 doesn't work, and given that a proosal can alter the rules, rule
> > 155 can *never* work - any sufficiently convoluted proosal will be able
> > to override it. (Excepting the discovery of the long-sought Immutable
> > Rule, a beast for which we have as yet no evidence).
>
> Not yet a Proposal:  __Fix Rule 155__
>
> Give Rule 155 (No kickbacks) a Chutzpah of 9, and replace its text with the
> following:
> {{
> I. Legislative Kickbacks
>
> If a proposal would directly or indirectly discriminate between players
> based on their voting actions on that proposal, or any other specific
> proposal(s) identified in the proposal, then the adoption of that proposal
> does not cause any part of the proposal to take effect.
>
> II. Judicial Kickbacks
>
> If a CFI would directly or indirectly call for discrimination between
> players based on their judicial actions on that CFI, or any other specific
> CFI(s) identified in the CFI, then the Judge of that CFI can and must
> Judge it "Refused".
> }}


I'd vote yes... once I'm done exploiting the old version :)