Ed Murphy on 14 May 2002 18:59:51 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Prop change |
uin wrote: > Rule 155 doesn't work, and given that a proosal can alter the rules, rule > 155 can *never* work - any sufficiently convoluted proosal will be able to > override it. (Excepting the discovery of the long-sought Immutable Rule, a > beast for which we have as yet no evidence). Not yet a Proposal: __Fix Rule 155__ Give Rule 155 (No kickbacks) a Chutzpah of 9, and replace its text with the following: {{ I. Legislative Kickbacks If a proposal would directly or indirectly discriminate between players based on their voting actions on that proposal, or any other specific proposal(s) identified in the proposal, then the adoption of that proposal does not cause any part of the proposal to take effect. II. Judicial Kickbacks If a CFI would directly or indirectly call for discrimination between players based on their judicial actions on that CFI, or any other specific CFI(s) identified in the CFI, then the Judge of that CFI can and must Judge it "Refused". }} -- Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> "I'm not sure I can go through http://members.fortunecity.com/emurphy/ with it. Leave, I mean."