spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal 276 again...

[ID Scott <Iain.Scott.01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Jonathan David Amery wrote:

> Revise Rule 127 to read:
> {{
> __Judges__
> 
> When a Call for Inquiry has been made, the Admin shall randomly select
> one player among the allowed players to be the Judge. Allowed players
> for the purpose of this rule are all players excepting the Defendant,
> the Plaintiff and players on the LMJ. If that leaves no players
> allowed to be the Judge, then out of the players on the LMJ, the
> player who was placed on the LMJ first shall be the Judge.
> 
> In the event of a CFI naming the Admin as defendant, the duty of
> randomly selecting an Judge shall fall to the player with the highest
> Score. That player will also not be allowed to be a Judge for the CFI.
> }}
> 
And if there are no players on the LMJ? 

cheers,
Iain