Wonko on 29 Mar 2002 21:02:50 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ |
Quoth Alex Truelsen, > Well, this isn't good. Okay, then, I'm going to try this: > > > Add the following k:-O delimited text to the end of the list in Rule 293: > > k:-O > 10) May NOT be apprehended by the Police Gremlin, unless eir BAC is greater > than or equal to 5, in which event they are still apprehended, but no points > are taken from em. > k:-O > By my count we're up to nine, not ten (less since Goldie may also be technically illegal) > > If Rule 501 has been removed from the ruleset, create a new rule with the > following +0:-) delimited text: > > +0:-) ><snip> > +0:-) Rule 501 will not be 'removed' from the ruleset, it will cease to ever have been part of the ruleset (and some other rule will have been 501 all along, I think). You might consider changing this to something like, "If there is no rule entitled <whatever you called it>, make a rule with that name that reads as follows:" -- Wonko hates it when the past is wrong.