Wonko on 29 Mar 2002 21:02:50 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ


Quoth Alex Truelsen,

> Well, this isn't good. Okay, then, I'm going to try this:
> 

> 
> Add the following k:-O delimited text to the end of the list in Rule 293:
> 
> k:-O
> 10) May NOT be apprehended by the Police Gremlin, unless eir BAC is greater
> than or equal to 5, in which event they are still apprehended, but no points
> are taken from em.
> k:-O
> 

By my count we're up to nine, not ten (less since Goldie may also be
technically illegal)


> 
> If Rule 501 has been removed from the ruleset, create a new rule with the
> following +0:-) delimited text:
> 
> +0:-)
><snip>
> +0:-)

Rule 501 will not be 'removed' from the ruleset, it will cease to ever have
been part of the ruleset (and some other rule will have been 501 all along,
I think). You might consider changing this to something like,
"If there is no rule entitled <whatever you called it>, make a rule with
that name that reads as follows:"


--
Wonko
hates it when the past is wrong.